Qualitative Research Assessment
The DFG funds research projects based on their academic quality. The principle of “quality over quantity” has long been integral to its funding philosophy. Academic quality is assessed in a differentiated manner, taking account of the relevant disciplinary and research context.
Peer review by recognised experts in their respective fields plays a central role in the evaluation of research proposals. This process takes a holistic approach to assessing academic achievements, with an emphasis on qualitative criteria.
Reviewers are encouraged to consider the full breadth of academic achievements, individual career stages and career paths. Details of quantitative metrics such as impact factors and h-indices are not required and are not to be considered as part of the review.
This approach is supported by the (interner Link), which was introduced in 2022. It enables applicants to present a variety of academic achievements and individual career paths, thereby providing a broader information base for the review. At the same time, the DFG is committed to mitigating the potential influence of unconscious (interner Link) in its review and evaluation procedures.
National and International Engagement
In addition to its own funding activities, the DFG is also engaged internationally in advancing research assessment. It signed the (externer Link) in 2021 and has been a member of the (externer Link) since its founding phase in 2022. DORA and CoARA advocate assessing academic achievements primarily based on their intrinsic merit and giving due recognition to the full range of research contributions and activities.