Evaluation Studies and Statistical Reports
With the evaluation of a DFG funding programme, it is possible to (a) assess the success of a process and (b) lay an empirical basis for DFG funding policy. In doing so, evaluative studies utilise sociological methods, such as statistical analyses, surveys or bibliometric assessments.
“The study ‘Kleine Fächer – große Dynamik’ (Small Disciplines – Big Dynamism) investigates how often researchers in small disciplines submit proposals to DFG funding programmes.
The study focuses on their participation in coordinated programmes such as Collaborative Research Centres and Research Training Groups.
The study ‘Research Funding and Career Paths – Comparative Study on DFG Programmes for Research Career Support’ examines the career paths of applicants in programmes for early career researchers to investigate whether the associated funding objectives are achieved.
The Research-Oriented Standards on Gender Equality were adopted by the member organisations of the DFG in 2008 as a voluntary obligation. The study ‘DFG Research-Oriented Standards on Gender Equality: Implementation and Impact’ examines what measures have been taken and what impact the Research-Oriented Standards on Gender Equality have had, both within the member organisations and on gender equality in the German research system as a whole.
This report provides statistical information on the Heisenberg Programme and was published in conjunction with the fifth Heisenberg Networking Meeting, held in Bonn in March 2017.